Who is your Favourite Vaping reviewer?

1) Todd
- because Todd

2) Bloodygoodvaping
- high end gear reviews

3) Richard Ng
- malaysian reviewer

4) Phil
- super in depth review. Hour long reviews. Good to pass time. Lol

Sent from my SM-N910C using Tapatalk

 

Todd and PB. Mainly because both are realistic in their criticisms and a lot of the little annoyance faults that they bring up are the things that I don't like as well. AND they don't use stupid gimmicks.

 

Do you guys have a link to Todd's channel?　Or any other reviewers with unbiased reviews?

 

Here is the one from Todd

Todds Reviews - YouTube

 

Cheers! Will check him out now

 

DJLsb Vapes - YouTube
BAMvaping Reviews - YouTube

 

Opinions totally changed since my last posts, same as my taste in juice.
Todd
Vapnfagan
Mike vapes
Dean, the biking vaper
The Modified Vaper. If I needed audio books, I'd want him to record them.

 

I now like Grimm Green the best but don't always agree with him.

Used to like DJLSB a lot but all of his "Of course..." sentence openings sting me now and I can hardly take it any more as it's usually not "Of course" information and too frequent. Also, his vape pauses with profile view of him exhaling is... Yeah, I know, nitpicking and sorta stupid of me. Do appreciate his work and still check him out from time to time.

In the past I used to close his vids immediately because of his coarseness but now I really like The Vaping Bogan. Not really for accuracy and details but entertaining as Hell. Here's a great recent review below that is Not Safe For Work or the ears of little kids. A bit drawn-out on the rant at the end but it's a good laugh.

 

Different culture I guess, but that's not funny at all for me.

 

Maybe so, I find it hilarious, in spots.

 

I agree however with Daniel. He has become a bit too sloppy for my taste, too. He speaking is often full of repeats, and with some devices he does not drill down to the core anymore as what he did before.

 

You can easily tell he's a really nice guy and devoted to helping the vape community (respect him a lot for that) but yes, he has gaps and actually sometimes misrepresents in words what his own testing information is demonstrating. For example. a 20 degree inaccuracy with one TC mod is described as being quite accurate while another one he reviews being 5 degrees off is described as being inaccurate. Maybe it's just an English thing with him.

 

Inconsistant judgements or inaccurate language uasage? May be he simply churns out too many videos now. 5 degrees seems not bad but 20 degrees certainly is not good. That German company proved it is possible to make a TC device with spot on accuracy.

A certain inaccuracy in English when needing to say something precisly but not always being able to. I have the same problem sometimes. Once we pass 20 or 25 we are stuck in the way speaking as how we use language in our mother tongue, not the colours and expressions you would be using as native speaker.

 

Mikhail Perevalov from Russia,

I could not stop my laughing

here is the review:

 

Its funny how things change but for me the only people I watch on a regular basis anymore are:

Reviews:
1)Todd
2)X1 Vape Reviews

Vape Shows:
1)Plumes of Hazard
2)Ideal Ohm Show